目前分類:Learning at Harvard (5)

瀏覽方式: 標題列表 簡短摘要

The Harvard's teaching method was very impressive.  In Taiwan, the English course is usually divided into a few types of classes based on functions, such as grammar, conversation, writing, listening, vocabulary...etc, and that's the way we were so comfortable with. Here at Harvard, it integrated four skills together: listening, speaking, reading and writing.  In other words, the course was designed to be content-oriented.  The biggest difference of English classes between Taiwan and Harvard was we had tons and tons of assignment here.   We were required to read a lot of assignment or do research before we went to class.  Besides reading, we had to look up the vocabularies on our own, to annotate, and to come up with a few questions.  Everybody was so stressed out.  I stayed up late and got up early to catch up with my homework but still couldn't finish all of them.  At first, I was kind of disappointed, thinking that "Is this the English program I want?"  I would really like to work on listening and speaking skills instead of spending most of my time doing research and studying.   I would like to learn something more practical like TV news or newspaper or something.



I just finished my stressful graduate study at Brandeis.  I desperatedly wanted to have a relaxed summer vacation to enjoy learning English language, not jumped into another even more challenging program.  Oh no!  I complained a lot.  I felt depressed Sometimes.  A lot of times, I just didn't want to do my homework until the last minute.  When time went on, I gradually found the classes were so valuable, and started to appreciate the hard work and the great efforts the educators and instructors had put into in our classes.  We had visiting activities once a week and lectures twice a week.  With regard to visiting activities, we went to Treedom Trail, JFK museum, The Science Senter and The Peabody museum..etc, during which we were required to do research and class discussion before and after our visiting. 

eileenlin1219 發表在 痞客邦 留言(2) 人氣()


Am I passionate about English? Sometimes I am confused about the reason why I’ve been studying English so hard. Do I consider English language as a tool which might give a boost to my future career, or do I treat English as an entertaining value, loving it with all my heart? I really don’t know. I only know that when I feel upset, stressed or depressed, studying English at a café can comfort my anxiety and sadness, making me forget all my sorrows. I only know that if I have a laid-back afternoon when I don’t have to work or to suffer from the heavy burden of schoolwork, I’d love to go to a coffee shop to enjoy my time there, studying English with a great cup of coffee and with soft music. That is my favorite thing to do. Learning English makes me feel fulfilled and delighted.

Most importantly, the most valuable lesson I learned at Harvard was to have exceeded the English language itself. The greatest benefit that will last my lifetime will be the attitude to approach knowledge. We’re required to do research: to read, to annotate, and to listen to the materials online and then come to class to discuss the work. This Top-Down learning method at Harvard is vastly different from the way I learned in Taiwan, where students are used to coming to class and waiting for the teacher to feed his or her knowledge to them. “Whatever you can do yourselves, you have to do it on your own,” said Liane Jeschull, my workshop instructor. I have learned how to absorb knowledge proactively, instead of passively. It is significantly important, and it will be a great influence for the rest of my life. Be prepared and come to discuss!  

eileenlin1219 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

My research paper at Harvard University

Introduction


        The recent news that shocked Taiwan’s society and has stirred up fierce debates in this island is that the university admission rate has hit a record high of over 100%, which means any student can be admitted into one of the universities even if they get zero score during the examination (The China Post, “University admission rate hits record high of over 100%”). An increasing number of people have harshly criticized the admission committee and have called for a reform for the Taiwan’s higher education, arguing that an excessive number of universities are the root cause of the low quality of college students. Having experienced graduate studies in both Taiwan and the US, I believe that high admission rate is just one of the numerous factors that lead to low quality of the higher education. Except for admission, we should look into causes deeply in a social and cultural context. This study will scrutinize three major differences between the US and Taiwan’s higher education: time to choose a college major, the teaching and learning styles, and the students’ learning attitudes. By means of comparison of the higher education systems between these two countries, the objectives of the study aim to make suggestions to Taiwan’s college students and to Taiwan’s higher education reform.

eileenlin1219 發表在 痞客邦 留言(2) 人氣()

 

Argument Essay

There is a tricky yet interesting news that when asked, “Which candidate will you vote for if tomorrow will be the vote date?” more than a half of the American would say they will vote for Barack Obama. However, CNN confirmed in its nationwide survey in June, 2008 that when continually asked, “Which candidate do you think has a greater chance of winning the election?” most people might say John McCain. This fact indicates that most people like Obama more than McCain, but people do not think Obama will win, which means Obama needs to increase his trustworthiness and reliability. Nevertheless, while many people may argue that Obama is inexperienced, and that race has still been an issue for him, there is some strong evidence showing that Obama has a better chance of winning the election due to three reasons: the latest polls, his personal characteristics, and the recent media coverage.  

eileenlin1219 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Compare and Contrast Essay

Why did Martin Luther King Jr. win the Nobel Peace Prize? Why not Malcolm X? Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are both essential and well-known black heroes in the history of the American Civil Rights Movement.  Both of them grew up in the same period of time, 1920-1960, and both were tragically assassinated. Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X have some parallels, they exhibit essential and intense differences in the way that they preach about the equal rights between blacks and whites. While Malcolm X long believed that it is impossible to achieve full equality with whites without fierce force and revolution, Martin Luther King Jr., for most of his life, promoted non-violent integration, urging that blacks and whites should be united and live together in peace. Why do these two powerful leaders display considerable discrepancies where it concerns the promotion of black rights?

First of all, the family backgrounds of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X have great influences on their responses to American racism. Martin Luther King Jr., born in Atlanta in 1929, was raised in a middle-class family where his parents gave him all the love they could, and protected him from fear, although blacks suffered considerable injustice at that time.  In addition, with significant economic support from family, King’s home was almost dream-like to many people. “King paraded his graduation present in a new green Chevrolet before his fellow graduates,” the example from the book Reflecting Black gives us a rough idea about his carefree childhood.

eileenlin1219 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()